Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News

Georgia Railroad Company Faces Eminent Domain Controversy

Sparta residents attend a Georgia Public Service Commission hearing on whether a railroad company can use eminent domain to condemn property in their community, Tuesday, Aug. 6, 2024, in Atlanta. (AP

A recent hearing in Georgia has brought to light concerns regarding a railroad company's use of eminent domain in Sparta, one of the state's economically disadvantaged areas. Sandersville Railroad Co. has been granted permission to condemn nine properties in Sparta to construct a 4.5-mile rail line known as the Hanson Spur, connecting to the CSX railroad line.

Property owners in Sparta, some facing potential land condemnation, have raised objections alongside the No Railroad in Our Community Coalition. They argue that Sandersville has not met Georgia's eminent domain law requirements, which mandate demonstrating public use and business necessity. While Sandersville presented potential customers at the hearing, signed contracts with these customers or CSX were not provided.

Opponents, represented by the Institute for Justice, claim the project primarily serves profit motives rather than public interest. Concerns were also raised about the lack of transparency regarding project costs and feasibility.

On the other hand, Sandersville's legal counsel emphasized the necessity of the rail line for efficient business operations, citing limitations faced by potential users in accessing markets served by CSX. Residents fear the rail line could lead to the expansion of a nearby quarry, impacting their quality of life.

Amidst the legal battle, Sparta residents like Blaine Smith are determined to protect their generational land from being acquired. The Smiths, who value their land beyond monetary considerations, express strong opposition to the railroad's intrusion into their lives.

While Sandersville has made efforts to negotiate with affected landowners and has reached agreements with some, the dispute underscores the complex interplay between private property rights and infrastructure development. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for property law nationwide, making it a matter of significance beyond the local community.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.