As regards the suggestion to remove the cotton excise duty Sir Malcolm said :- "You are well aware that the imposition of this duty will fall on the consumers. But what I was not prepared for was that excessive sympathy for the consumer professed by the advocates from Bombay. I do not remember that when the mills were making very large profits, they showed any practical sympathy to the consumers by reducing their rate of profit. This duty had been denounced as counter-vailing duty and some members have told they cannot accept it. This is no longer a countervailing duty. I do not admit that this has been done in the interests of Manchester or as a countervailing duty or to the dictation of any interest except our own revenue interest. I will brook neither here nor any where, the statement that I and my colleague were influenced by anything except the desire to make our budget square. How ridiculous that statement is would be seen from the observation of Sir Vithaldas that the real competitor is Japan and not Manchester.
Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
One app.
Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles. One news app.
From the Archives (March 8, 1922): Cotton excise
Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member?
Sign in here
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member?
Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member?
Sign in here
Our Picks