Former Hunter Biden associate Tony Bobulinski is set to give a closed-door testimony today on Capitol Hill as part of the Biden impeachment inquiry. Bobulinski worked alongside Hunter Biden on a Chinese energy company and claims to have had multiple face-to-face meetings with President Joe Biden while discussing the deal in 2017. He has expressed his frustration with the President's denial of their meetings, stating that Biden should consult his son Hunter and brother Jim for a reminder of the facts.
Bobulinski's testimony is expected to last up to eight hours, and many view him as a key player in the events under investigation. In 2017, shortly after Joe Biden stepped down as vice president, important discussions regarding the China energy deal took place, with Bobulinski present. These meetings, which also involved Jim Biden and Hunter Biden, were held in Los Angeles during a milking conference. The discussions centered around a new deal with a Chinese company and the division of profits.
Text messages exchanged between Bobulinski and another associate of the Biden family shed light on the secrecy surrounding their dealings. One message reads, 'Don't mention Joe being involved. It's only when you are face to face. I know you know that, but they are paranoid.' In response, Bobulinski stated, 'Okay, they should be paranoid about things.' These messages reinforce the notion that meetings did occur, and the content of these meetings is apparent.
The Democrats face the challenge of spin as this evidence becomes increasingly difficult to ignore. Joe Biden's denial and alleged lack of recollection regarding the 2017 meetings are now being called into question, especially after the release of the Rob Hur report. The report has shed new light on the situation, creating an atmosphere in which the Democrats' attempts to downplay the issue seem less credible.
However, the left continues to show reluctance in addressing the particulars of Joe Biden's involvement in his son's business transactions. They seem to evade discussions about how Joe Biden may have influenced these deals and potentially benefited from them. These facts paint a picture of potential corruption and raise concerns about the way Biden conducted business both as vice president and now as president.
The handling of this issue by some Democrats is reminiscent of a three-year-old covering their ears, refusing to acknowledge the facts. The attempt to push this matter aside is evident, but the mounting evidence and growing public scrutiny demand a more thorough investigation. The American people deserve transparency and accountability from their elected officials, and it is essential to uncover the truth behind these allegations. As Bobulinski's testimony unfolds behind closed doors, its impact on the impeachment inquiry and the broader political landscape remains to be seen.
