Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Reason
Reason
Politics
Eugene Volokh

First and Fourth Amendment Claims Based on Police Investigation of Gender Queer in Classroom Can Go Forward

From Galdos-Shapiro v. Town of Great Barrington, decided Oct. 17 by Judge Mark Mastroianni (D. Mass.):

Beginning in 2018, Plaintiff worked as an English Language Arts teacher at Du Bois Regional Middle School in Great Barrington, Massachusetts…. [Superintendent] Dillon appointed her advisor to the school's local chapter of the Gender and Sexuality Alliance ("GSA"). Although paid, this position was primarily administrative, as she oversaw the local branch of "a national network of student-run organizations which unite LGBTQ+ and allied youth in an effort to build their community and to enable them to organize around issues impacting them in their schools and communities." It was Plaintiff's job to "facilitate a space and opportunity for the students themselves to undertake activities." She therefore opened her classroom during the seventh and eighth grade lunch and recess periods each Friday for the GSA's student run meetings. Plaintiff additionally acted as faculty liaison to the school's student run "Black, Indigenous, and People of Color Club," a group that met during the weekly Friday "crew period." …

Gender Queer is a graphic memoir addressing "issues of self-identity, the confusion of adolescence, and coming out as nonbinary." … Gender Queer is not part of the curriculum at Du Bois. It is not required to be kept in any classroom, nor must it be read by any student who does not wish to do so. Rather, Plaintiff kept a personally owned copy of the book in her classroom.

At one point in time, Plaintiff loaned the book to Du Bois's library for exhibition during a "Banned Book Week," but normally the book resided on a special bookshelf within her room dedicated to the GSA. To access the book, an interested student was required to obtain permission from Plaintiff. During her tenure at Du Bois, only one student sought access to the book. This student and the student's parents were well known to Plaintiff, and it was Plaintiff's understanding that the student's parents approved of their child's access to the book.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.