Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Federal Judge Rejects Republican Claims Of Improper Absentee Ballots

A drop slot for voting ballots and absentee applications is shown outside of the Warren City Hall complex Thursday, Oct. 24, 2024, in Warren, Mich. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)

A federal judge in Georgia has ruled against ordering several counties to reject absentee ballots that were hand-delivered to polling places over the weekend. The decision came after a lengthy hearing where Judge Stan Baker dismissed Republican claims of improper ballot casting.

During the hearing, Judge Baker emphasized that the additional hours given to voters for dropping off their ballots did not constitute a significant disparity. He criticized the Republican allegations as 'cherry-picking' and stated that discriminating against certain voters to favor a particular candidate would be unfair.

Additional hours for ballot drop-off were deemed fair by Judge Baker.
Judge Baker dismissed Republican claims of improper ballot casting.
Confusion between 'advance voting' and 'absentee voting' led to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit, brought by the Georgia Republican Party and the Republican National Committee, targeted seven counties for allegedly accepting ballots after the end of early voting. However, Judge Baker clarified that the confusion between 'advance voting' and 'absentee voting' led to the misunderstanding, as these are distinct processes outlined in state and federal laws.

Furthermore, Judge Baker suggested that the lawsuit appeared to target counties with a Democratic leaning, rather than addressing any genuine irregularities in the voting process. The accused counties vehemently defended their actions, asserting that they followed standard procedures and had already counted many of the hand-delivered ballots in question.

One attorney representing Cobb County criticized the plaintiffs for being 'willfully blind' and bringing improper arguments to court on the eve of the election. The judge's ruling underscores the importance of upholding fair and transparent election practices, particularly in the face of contentious legal challenges.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.