Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News

Father Of Subway Chokehold Victim Sues Defendant In NYC

Daniel Penny arrives to the courthouse in New York, Thursday, Dec. 5, 2024. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

The father of the victim involved in the fatal New York City subway chokehold trial has taken legal action against the defendant as a Manhattan jury deliberates the case. The lawsuit, filed in New York Supreme Court, accuses Marine veteran Daniel Penny of negligence, assault, and battery in connection with the death of the victim, a 30-year-old man named Jordan Neely.

The incident occurred on May 1, 2023, when Penny, then 24 years old, placed Neely in a chokehold for approximately six minutes on a crowded underground train. Neely, who was homeless, had been behaving erratically and shouting before the altercation.

The victim's father is seeking damages exceeding the jurisdictional limits of lower courts through the lawsuit. Penny's lawyer has dismissed the suit as a distraction, emphasizing that Penny is currently awaiting a verdict from the jury.

Incident involved Marine veteran Daniel Penny and victim Jordan Neely.
Father accuses defendant of negligence, assault, and battery.
Penny placed Neely in a chokehold for six minutes on a subway train.
Victim's father seeks damages exceeding lower court limits.
Defense challenges medical examiner's determination on cause of death.
Jury requests to review videos and testimonies from medical experts.
Debate sparked on race relations, public safety, homelessness, and mental illness.
Trial raises questions on use of force, self-defense, and public space responsibilities.
Defense pathologist suggests various factors contributed to victim's death.

During the trial, the defense challenged the city medical examiner's determination that the chokehold caused Neely's death. A defense pathologist suggested that Neely's death was a result of various factors, including drug use and underlying health conditions.

The jury, which is deliberating the case, requested to review various pieces of evidence, including videos of the incident and testimonies from medical experts. The case has sparked debates on race relations, public safety, homelessness, and mental illness, with differing perspectives on the actions of the defendant.

The trial has not yet reached a verdict, and the jury will continue its discussions. The case has raised important questions about use of force, self-defense, and the responsibilities of individuals in public spaces.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.