Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
International Business Times UK
International Business Times UK
Politics
Bernadette B. Tixon

Experts Say Trump's Case for Striking Iran Was Built on Claims That 'Simply Aren't True'

Experts say Trump’s Iran strike built on false nuclear and missile claims. (Credit: Gage Skidmore/WikiMedia Commons)

When the US and Israel launched joint military strikes against Iran on 28 February, President Donald Trump told the American people that the action was necessary — that Iran was on the verge of a nuclear weapon and building ballistic missiles that could soon reach the United States. Senior administration officials echoed those warnings, briefing reporters under anonymity that the threat from Tehran had become 'an intolerable risk.'

But within hours of the strikes, which killed at least 201 people and wounded 747, figures not independently confirmed by American or international authorities, a chorus of national security analysts, arms control experts and former government officials were already picking those justifications apart. Their conclusion, drawn from intelligence assessments and decades of research, was stark: the White House had leant heavily on claims that were either wrong or greatly exaggerated.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.