During a recent testimony, the former publisher of the National Enquirer revealed some insights into the inner workings of the tabloid industry. David Pecker stated that he had significant influence over the celebrity content featured in the magazines, claiming to have had 'the final say' on such matters.
One of the controversial practices discussed was the use of 'checkbook journalism,' where tabloids would pay for stories. Pecker mentioned that editors had the authority to spend up to $10,000 on investigating and publishing a story without seeking further approval. However, any expenses exceeding this amount would require vetting and approval from Pecker himself.
These revelations shed light on the financial dynamics behind tabloid journalism and the extent to which editors had autonomy in pursuing stories. The testimony provided a glimpse into the decision-making processes within the National Enquirer and similar publications, highlighting the role of individuals like Pecker in shaping the content that reaches readers.
