Coleen Rooney found out she won her sensational courtroom battle with Rebekah Vardy today.
The trial, which took place in May, centred around the explosive claims Mrs Vardy was leaking stories about Mrs Rooney to the press.
The 40-year-old, who is married to Leicester City striker Jamie, was suing Mrs Rooney, the wife of England star Wayne, for defamation in a hearing dubbed 'Wagatha Christie' by fans.
READ MORE: Coleen Rooney wins Wagatha Christie court battle against Rebekah Vardy as verdict announced
Mrs Rooney, 36, uploaded several fake stories to her private Instagram account in a six- month sting to find out who was sharing private information with The S*n newspaper.
She then publicly accused the fellow WAG in the now-infamous Wagatha Christie tweet in October 2019 which ended: “It’s…… Rebekah Vardy’s account."
Over seven days in courtroom number 13 at the Royal Courts of Justice, the two footballers' wives each gave evidence as revelations from the case made daily headlines across the British press.
In a judgment published today, Mrs Justice Steyn laid out her reasons for her decision.
Every word of the 'Truth Defence' decision below:
I have found that Ms Vardy was party to the disclosure to The S*n of the Marriage, Birthday, Halloween, Pyjamas, Car Crash, Gender Selection, Babysitting and Flooded Basement Posts. It is likely that Ms Watt undertook the direct act, in relation to each post, of passing the information to a journalist at The S*n.
Nonetheless, the evidence analysed above clearly shows, in my view, that Ms Vardy knew of and condoned this behaviour, actively engaging in it by directing Ms Watt to the Private Instagram Approved Judgment Vardy v Rooney Account, sending her screenshots of Ms Rooney’s posts, drawing attention to items of potential interest to the press, and answering additional queries raised by the press via Ms Watt.
It is also likely that additional information from the Private Instagram Account was passed to the press by them. It is evident that information that was passed to the press would not necessarily be published (e.g. the Babysitter Post). On some occasions, information is likely to have been disclosed to assist the press with articles they were already writing without warranting an enquiry by the press or being obvious that information had been derived from the Private Instagram Account (e.g. information as to whether Ms Rooney had gone to Florida).
Press enquiries would not necessarily be run past Ms Rooney (e.g. Mr Stretford’s evidence regarding the Car Crash enquiry)and, given the deletion of Ms Monk’s email account when she left the company, there may have been more press enquiries than are apparent in the evidence. Having regard to the evidence that is available, and my conclusions regarding the evidence which is missing, it is appropriate to draw an inference that Ms Vardy and Ms Watt together leaked more information from the Private Instagram Account over the course of 2017-2019 than that which is contained in the eight posts to which I have referred.
In my judgment, the conclusions that I have reached as to the extent to which the claimant engaged in disclosing to The S*n information to which she only had access as a permitted follower of an Instagram account which she knew, and Ms Rooney repeatedly asserted, was private, suffice to show that the single meaning is substantially true.
The information disclosed was not deeply confidential, and it can fairly be described as trivial, but it does not need to be confidential or important to meet the sting of the libel. It was information derived from private posts that Ms Rooney did not want made public. The Pyjamas Post, for example, was a photograph that Ms Rooney may well have been content to share publicly at a different point in time, but the timing of its disclosure revealed very personal information that she had chosen not to make public. I recognise, of course, that it can be said that the Gender Selection and Flooded Basement Posts were fabricated stories that Ms Rooney was keen to see published precisely because she wanted to catch the person responsible for leaking her information. This does not detract from the conclusion that the essential sting of the libel has been shown to be true.
Receive newsletters with the biggest and breaking TV and showbiz news by
Live updates in Vardy V Rooney 'Wagatha Christie' verdict
Emmerdale's Rosie Bentham declares love for co-star as she celebrates special day
Jane McDonald's four stone weight loss as star shares snack tips for cravings
A Place in the Sun fans make same complaint as Channel 4 show returns for new series
Coronation Street actress supported as she's second star to announce exit this week
