The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the critical need for robust and equitable public health systems in Canada that address the population’s diverse needs. One of the most glaring issues during the pandemic was the lack of standardized definitions and consistent data collection methods regarding ethnicity and race within the health system. This gap was particularly evident in the discrepancies between federal and provincial systems.
The importance of data collection
During the pandemic, timely and accurate data on COVID-19 infectivity rates among different ethnic and racialized groups were insufficient. This hindered efforts to identify hotspots and effectively prioritize increased opportunities for testing and vaccinations.
The absence of such data reflects a broader issue: the need for structured and formalized data collection practices for public health purposes that do not depend on provincial priorities.
Currently, data collection varies across regions. Public health systems often do not collect self-reported ethnicity and race in a standardized and safe manner. They may not have digitized vaccine records, and often lack access to comprehensive health-care system data.
To be prepared for future epidemics, these gaps in the public health system must be addressed. As physicians and research experts we suggest the following “prescription,” which includes a three-pronged strategy.
1. Collect key demographic characteristics
First, provincial governments and public health organizations should begin routine collection of key demographic characteristics, including ethnicity and race, to identify hotspots — communities that have a higher caseload — of preventable infectious diseases. These data are essential for guiding evidence-based decision-making and improving public health responses.
At the federal level, the Disaggregated Data Action Plan (DDAP) aims to improve data collection from diverse populations and enable intersectional assessments considering sex/gender, ethnicity and race, and socioeconomic status. Collaboration between Statistics Canada, provincial and territorial governments is crucial to address data gaps, uncover health inequity, and inform policy and research priorities.
The federal government set an example with DDAP, and during the pandemic, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) worked closely with provincial and territorial colleagues, academics and research funders. During the COVID-19 pandemic PHAC strengthened its connection with communities, including facilitating by regular meetings with faith-based leaders, which exemplified the importance of ongoing community alliances.
Provincial and municipal data collection is necessary because public health responses are administered provincially. Localized data helps to address specific community needs. This was seen in Toronto’s neighbourhood-specific studies during the pandemic, which informed the deployment of mobile vaccine clinics.
In addition to quantitative data, qualitative data from the pandemic provides valuable lessons for public health officials. It’s crucial to highlight the experiences of essential workers who, lacking sick pay or worksite testing, continued to work even when symptomatic.
Read more: COVID-19 outbreaks in long-term care highlight the urgent need for paid sick leave
Another example is the neglect of higher-risk communities in prioritizing testing centres and early vaccine roll-out. This type of qualitative data helps paint accurate pictures of how inequities shaped transmission of the virus, to combat stereotypes and misinformation in public discussion about viral transmission, and helps ensure that the narrative does not falsely suggest these communities disregarded public health advice and continued to gather.
2. Community engagement
Second, community engagement and trust-building with marginalized groups is essential and should precede data collection. These can be identified in each region using census-level information, which includes information on type of housing, socioeconomic factors, age, and immigration and racialized status. During the COVID-19 pandemic, ethnic-specific research provided valuable insights into vaccine hesitancy and helped counter stigmatization narratives.
However, delays in engaging ethnically diverse communities in research were common, often due to the lengthy process of securing funding and ethics board approvals.
Vaccine hesitancy in marginalized communities was influenced by several factors: mistrust of the rapid vaccine development process, historical experiences of racism, and concerns about long-term side effects.
Health service providers, including public health officials, must foster ongoing dialogue with these communities about matters of population health — including healthy active living, healthy babies and mothers, and routine childhood vaccination. Building relationships with on-the-ground grassroots organizations, settlement agencies and faith-based groups plays a vital role in these conversations, helping to dispel misinformation and building trust.
3. Tailored communication
The third requirement is effective communication of culturally tailored information delivered in a language concordant with a community’s needs. In the pandemic, physicians and public health officials’ communication through mainstream media were consistently included as trusted sources of information among specific ethnic and race groups.
Furthermore, providing information regarding COVID-19 testing and vaccination availability in multiple languages, and delivery of services by people who looked like them was crucial in research studies of Black, South Asian, racialized and Indigenous communities. Linguistic and cultural matching between health-care workers, researchers and community members strengthens trust, while poorly translated health messaging begins to erode it.
The lessons learned from COVID-19 should prompt all levels of government to enhance co-ordination to deliver public health and respond efficiently and effectively for future outbreaks. Pandemic preparedness requires continuous community engagement and trust-building, which are prerequisites for effective data collection and public health response strategies.
Lessons from COVID-19
Unfortunately, the recent measles outbreak in southwestern Ontario reiterated the urgent need for rapid information sharing and dialogue with affected communities. The lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic should inform public health officials at all levels of government to work together in order to act swiftly and decisively in similar scenarios.
The COVID-19 pandemic has taught us that a one-size-fits-all approach is inadequate for addressing health inequities. A targeted, community-informed strategy is essential to improve public health responses to ensure equity for all Canadians. Moving forward, we must prioritize the collection and use of disaggregated data, build strong community partnerships, and ensure our public health systems are prepared to meet the needs of our entire population.
Sonia Anand received funding from Public Health Agency of Canada for COVID-19 research. She holds a Canada Research Chair and an endowed chair co-sponsored by Michael G DeGroote School of Medicine and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. She holds grants from CIHR, and consults with pharmaceutical companies in cardiovascular conditions including Novartis, Bayer AG, Servier, and Novonordisk.
Sujane Kandasamy has received funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) for community-based COVID-19 knowledge mobilization.
Upton D. Allen is a professor at the University of Toronto and is The Bastable-Potts Chair in Infectious Diseases Research, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children. He has received funding from SickKids, University of Toronto, CIHR, NSERC, Public Health Agency of Canada, COVID-19 Immunity Task Force..
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
