Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - AU
The Guardian - AU
National
Anne Davies NSW state correspondent

‘Enclaves for the rich’: new luxury housing is putting parts of Sydney out of reach to all but the very few

58 Campbell Parade, Bondi. Luxury housing redevelopment in some parts of Sydney comes while governments say they are focused on affordable housing
58 Campbell Parade in Bondi Beach is being turned into seven luxury apartments to be known as the Mayfair. Photograph: Blake Sharp-Wiggins/The Guardian

Bondi used to be home to surfers, backpackers and artists. But the bohemian vibe of Sydney’s most famous beach risks being swamped by a wave of high-end developments.

Older apartment blocks that provided affordable housing are being bought by companies and wealthy individuals, who are turning them into smaller blocks with fewer luxury dwellings, or sometimes single homes.

Several recent developments are part of a trend that has turned desirable streets into construction zones.

In Hastings Parade in North Bondi, one recent development application resulted in 10 units being turned into a single house.

On Campbell Parade in Bondi Beach, an art deco block of 16 units at the southern end of the beach has been gutted and is being turned into seven luxury apartments, to be known as the Mayfair. The top floor apartment is marketed at $22m to $24m.

Opposite North Bondi surf club, another art deco building on Campbell Parade currently housing a creperie and eight small units with million-dollar views, will make way for two luxury townhouses.

Nearby, on Hewlett Street in Bronte, 22 units from the 1960s have been demolished for nine luxury townhouses with an expected price tag of more than $20m each.

Sign up: AU Breaking News email

“It makes a mockery of our housing crisis,” says Paula Masselos, the former Labor mayor of Waverley council, which takes in Bondi beach.

“Our affordable housing stock is being cannibalised for expensive housing and it’s becoming a playground for the rich. The super wealthy will be the only people who can live here. It’s really depressing.”

Others beg to differ. David Malouf, of Highland Property, which is marketing the Mayfair, says it’s a good thing.

“The value is there in Bondi. It’s one of the most iconic beaches in the world. Let’s take advantage of it,” he says.

As Sydney grapples with a housing crisis that has already priced many young people out of the market, this latest phenomenon raises serious questions. What sort of city do we want in the future?

Should the eastern suburbs, the inner city, the lower north shore, and other areas once celebrated for their diversity, such as Kings Cross, be redeveloped into luxury housing? Isn’t the government trying to increase density and affordability?

What happens to communities if key workers, older people, artists and surfers are forced out?

‘Bondi is Bondi because of its diversity’

The City of Sydney has attempted to combat the trend of older blocks of flats being turned into luxury housing with a policy that prevents developers from reducing the number of dwellings by more than 15%.

Between 2018 and 2024, there were 25 development applications (DAs) in the City of Sydney council areas, which resulted in the loss of 65 dwellings, a spokesperson says.

These included the redevelopment of 13-17 Ithaca Road in Elizabeth Bay, which reduced the number of units from 32 to nine, and the conversion of a seven-unit building on St Neot Avenue in Potts Point into a single house.

The council’s attempt to block one high-profile luxury development – the demolition of the Chimes building in Potts Point and the replacement of 80 studio and one-bedroom units with 34 luxury apartments – was stymied by the state government.

The NSW Labor government intervened to declare the council’s policy could only apply to applications lodged after it came into force.

That meant the controversial Chimes development, backed by one of Australia’s richest businessmen, James Packer, couldn’t be stopped because the DA was lodged before the policy came into effect.

“Sydney should not simply become an enclave for the rich. We need more housing, not less,” the City of Sydney lord mayor, Clover Moore, said.

“While housing is the responsibility of the NSW government, the City of Sydney is committed to tackling the housing crisis, and we pull every lever we can to address the issue in our local area.”

Waverley council looked at a similar dwelling reduction rule in 2024.

When its policy limiting the reduction to 15% went on public exhibition it drew 10 submissions in favour and three against.

One submission stated: “This is an excellent amendment. It is distressing to see multiple tenants turfed out of their apartments so they can be converted to a single dwelling for the very wealthy.”

Another said: “Bondi is Bondi because it has diversity of people. This gives us vibrancy and so many restaurants, shops and facilities to access.”

However, when the Liberal mayor, Will Nemesh, who also works as public affairs spokesperson for developer Fivex Commercial Property, took over the reins after the council elections, the policy was dropped.

“The proposal was abandoned because it was poor planning policy that would not have achieved its goal of delivering more affordable housing for the Waverley community,” Nemesh says.

A Waverley council spokesperson said the council “recognises the importance of affordable housing availability and this year made their largest acquisition of affordable housing stock in close to 20 years”.

“The Bondi Junction masterplan, which is a strategic roadmap for Bondi Junction, aims to boost housing supply through providing a mix of dwellings to attract a diverse community.”

The NSW planning minister, Paul Scully, says the state government “has actively supported councils developing their own ‘no net dwelling loss’ policies and will continue to support any council that is designing a similar policy”.

Apartments left empty by investors

On the other side of Sydney Harbour, the same trend can be seen in Neutral Bay and North Sydney.

Two interwar blocks of flats at Kurraba Point containing 47 small, relatively affordable units, were snapped up by developer Thirdi Group, which has now developed 24 luxury apartments. The penthouse is on the market with a guide of $40m.

“The pocket park opposite used to be filled with children. The kids used to walk to school and mothers used to gather with their prams,” the North Sydney mayor, Zoe Baker says. “That’s all gone.”

Baker says a number of new apartments are left empty by investors and overseas buyers. Comment was sought from Thirdi.

Increasingly, developers of luxury apartments are accessing the NSW government’s affordable housing incentives, which allow up to 30% extra floor space if they include some “affordable” apartments. These must be rented at 20% below the market rent – but only for 15 years.

“It’s just kicking the can down the road,” Masselos says. “ What will happen in 15 years? Meanwhile, the developers get more height, rent and capital appreciation, and they can sell the units for millions in 15 years.”

The use of the policy has caused a storm in Paddington, where a three-storey block of 27 studio apartments on Oxford Street, opposite Victoria Barracks, is to be redeveloped into an eight-storey block of 40 mainly luxury units. The studios currently rent for about $450 to $500 a week.

There will be some affordable apartments in the new development, but rents for them are still likely to be considerably higher than rents now.

‘Affordable’ floorspace bonus

Back in Bondi, the use of the 30% “affordable” floorspace bonus is causing concern too. Two old blocks of units on Ramsgate Avenue in North Bondi are now being demolished to build 11 luxury units.

The developer, HSN, had originally proposed a four-storey building. But after it bought the site next door, it proposed a larger five-storey building, to include three affordable units.

Despite 32 objections from neighbours about the height in a neighbourhood of mainly two- and three-storey blocks and houses, the larger design was approved because it was within the rules once the 30% bonus was factored in. The top floors will have fabulous views of the beach.

A HSN spokesperson said: “Under the scheme established by the NSW government … developers who include affordable-housing apartments commit to providing those dwellings as affordable homes for a minimum of 15 years, and the ongoing management must be overseen by a registered community housing provider.

“The registered community provider engaged for this project is Homeground Real Estate. We will be providing three affordable housing apartments in the building in line with the requirements set out by the NSW government.”

Baker, the North Sydney mayor, says even with a 20% discount on market rent for the “affordable” apartments, most people who met the income test to qualify would find themselves in housing stress in her council area.

The City of Sydney says it is taking proactive action and using its financial clout to deliver genuinely affordable homes by using developer contributions to fund investment in conjunction with social housing providers.

“These homes are affordable in perpetuity, unlike the NSW government scheme,” Moore says. “We are on track to deliver more than 5,338 new affordable rental homes in perpetuity by 2036.”

The City of Sydney is also fighting in court to stop boarding houses in Paddington from being turned into luxury residences.

The planning minister says Labor “has introduced a range of policies to increase affordable housing as we tackle our housing challenge”.

“The affordable housing bonus has already seen 5,363 homes, including 1,128 affordable [dwellings], approved across greater Sydney.

“The Minns government also provided $450m to Landcom for essential worker housing and is undertaking the largest investment in social housing in NSW history.”

If you have something to share about this story, you can contact the Guardian Australia news teams using one of the following methods.

Secure Messaging in the Guardian app

The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.

If you don’t already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select ‘Secure Messaging’.

Email

- If you don't need strong security you can write to a Guardian Australia journalist using the details here. Click on a person to see their details. 

- For end to end encrypted email you can create a free Protonmail account and email gaus.contact@protonmail.com.

Messaging apps

You can also use the encrypted messaging apps Signal or WhatsApp to message us at +61 490 758 250.

SecureDrop and other secure methods

If you can safely use the tor network without being observed or monitored you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.

Finally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each. 

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.