People left struggling under the pressures of soaring household costs could be in line for an emergency boost of more than £700 to their Universal Credit payments. The Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) has asked Policy in Practice to look at the costs and consequences of three options to give the benefit a much-needed rise during the cost of living crisis, reports Birmingham Live.
The first option would mean increasing DWP benefits as though they had been given a 10 per cent rise in April 2022, rather than the 3.1 per cent that was applied at that time. At a cost of £3.1 billion to the Government, the move would mean 4.2 million households would gain an average of £729 a year, equivalent to an extra £60 a month.
The CSJ adds that its second option would be to restore the Universal Credit uplift, in which an additional £1,000 a year was given to claimants over 18 months of the pandemic. Reinstating this would cost £4.2 billion.
Read more: DWP PIP claimants could get £5,000 in back payments after error
The Government, however, has previously indicated this was only ever a temporary intervention. The CSJ acknowledges that the £729 rise may be seen as preferable, as "this lowers the cost to the Treasury, if this is a concern - it is a sensible alternative to restoring the £20 uplift."
The centre's third suggestion is to restore work allowances to 2015 levels. It would mean 1.66 million households in work and on Universal Credit would benefit from a policy costing £733 million, so the average gain would be £442 per year for each household in work.
A work allowance is the amount of benefit that working claimants are allowed to keep - for every £1 in wages above the level of that allowance, 55p of benefit is deducted. Work allowances only apply to those who have responsibility for a child or limited capability for work. The rate of deduction used to be 63p in the £1 but this was lowered in December 2021.
How do you feel about these possible changes? Tell us in the comments section.
In a report, the Centre for Social Justice - a think tank founded by former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith - said: "While the decision to cut the UC taper in the Autumn Budget put £1,000 back into the pockets of 1.9 million households, much of its value will be wiped out by inflation. And it will do nothing to protect those who are not in work.
"With UC only uprated by 3.1 per cent in April, those who rely on welfare for their income will experience a 7 per cent cut. To prevent this, the Chancellor and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions should implement an emergency in-year uprating, bringing UC into line with inflation to ensure it covers the true cost of living."
Sir Iain said rebates and discretionary funds represent "a step in the wrong direction for tackling poverty", arguing it would be better to uplift Universal Credit (UC) as it "links benefits to work". It comes after Boris Johnson said he cannot "magic away" all the soaring food and energy expenses, as he came under increasing pressure to alleviate the cost-of-living crisis.
Want the latest news delivered straight to your inbox? Click here to sign up for Nottinghamshire Live's newsletters.
The Government is already handing out £150 council tax rebates for many homes and will take £200 off energy bills from October. But campaigners say this will not be enough for many people because benefits rose by 3.1 per cent but inflation is now at 9 per cent.
In its report, the CSJ says the Government should consider reviewing the rate of benefits quarterly, rather than annually, at least as long as the "current period of unusual inflationary pressure" lasts. The think tank says the first increase should come at the end of June.
The CSJ also wants the Government to suspend UC debt repayments for six months and forgive historical debts "born of design issues in the legacy benefits system". In addition, environmental levies should be absorbed into general taxation, and the energy price cap should be reviewed quarterly rather than every six months "to avoid cliff-edges in prices", it said.
Last week, Chancellor Rishi Sunak said he was not able to raise payments by more than 3.1 per cent due to an old computer system that the Department for Work and Pensions uses. The Institute for Fiscal Studies economic think tank has suggested the poorest households might be facing inflation of 10.9 per cent - this is higher than average because they spend a larger portion of their money on heating and lighting their homes.
The Treasury and the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) have been approached for comment.
