Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Newcastle Herald
Newcastle Herald
Simon McCarthy

Drinking water 'safe' despite cancer-causing chemicals found in platypuses

Hunter Water says it routinely tests for PFOS and PFOA in the Hunter's water supply. File image.

Hunter and Sydney water utilities have insisted that tap water in the cities is safe to drink despite probable cancer-causing "forever chemicals" being found at levels exceeding overseas standards.

An Australian-first study of the chemicals found in the livers of eight dead platypuses collected from areas along the East Coast found that of all the animals, those found in the Hunter River at Morpeth contained the highest levels of PFOS, up to 1200 micrograms per kilogram.

According to the University of Western Sydney scientists who conducted the study, the figure represents some of the highest concentrations of any species in the world.

One platypus from the Ourimbah Creek on the Central Coast returned the second-highest results of 740 micrograms per kilogram.

The study said there were no safe concentration levels for the animals' health but draft Australian government guidelines that exposure "directly from their diet should not exceed 3.1 micrograms per kilogram of wet weight."

Still, officials insist that tap water is safe to drink. Sampling of treated water - including at Sydney's main reservoir of Warragamba Dam - revealed six sites with detectable levels of synthetic chemical compounds known as PFAS.

Such chemicals are found in everyday appliances, from non-stick pans to clothing, insecticides and food packaging.

Once in the environment, they don't degrade further, earning them the nickname "forever chemicals".

Hunter Water's water quality standards say that the region's drinking water is regularly tested and reports detections over 0.002 micrograms per litre.

"All results available to date show drinking water supplied by us is safe to drink," it said.

In April, the US Environmental Protection Agency found there was "no safe level of exposure" to two classes of PFAS chemicals in drinking water, and they were likely to cause cancer.

Sydney Water testing conducted in June and published online without further notification shows one group of the chemicals was found in filtered water from Warragamba, albeit on the cusp of detectable levels.

Two other groups of the chemicals tested were undetectable at Warragamba, which supplies 80 per cent of Sydney's drinking water.

Each result was below Australian drinking water standards, however those guidelines have been criticised as being out of date.

The United States recently set an enforceable threshold of four nanograms per litre, close to current detection levels.

The National Health and Medical Research Council, which shapes Australia's water rules, is reviewing its guidelines relating to the chemicals.

NSW Health protection director Jeremy McAnulty said he didn't want to pre-empt the review's findings but everyone should be reassured Sydney water was safe and met the relevant Australian standards.

"Sydney Water and other utilities regularly monitor for various parameters in drinking water to ensure it's safe and to identify risks and that's what's happening here," he said on Tuesday.

All NSW drinking water catchments will be monitored for PFAS annually, while water-filtration plants at Katoomba and Blackheath in the Blue Mountains will be tested monthly.

That is because they had the highest results at about 30 nanograms per litre of two potentially harmful chemicals.

"It's not above our guidelines, but just to be cautious we have chosen to get some additional monitoring for that system so we have a better understanding," Water NSW executive manager Fiona Smith said.

The published results did not surprise or alarm PFAS expert and University of Sydney head of civil engineering Stuart Khan.

"We're talking about very safe, very low levels of exposure that there is no reason for us to assume that it's not safe to drink," he told AAP.

"The more important point is that it won't be their major source of exposure."

Professor Khan said the same chemicals were in household dust, clothing, food, and food packaging, such as plastic-covered paper.

"Even if you were to avoid the drinking water, it doesn't actually have a significant impact on your overall level of exposure to these chemicals, because you're being exposed through food, packaging, clothing, the entire planet around us," he said.

The US EPA has taken a hardline approach to the chemicals in drinking water, setting health-based goals to reduce exposure to zero and forcing water authorities to publicise PFAS levels and clean up contaminated supplies.

The US expects that over many years the regime will prevent exposure to the chemicals via drinking water for about 100 million people and prevent thousands of deaths.

This story was compiled with reporting by AAP.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.