Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Defense Secretary Revokes 9/11 Plea Deal, Sparks Legal Battle

Defense Secretary James Mattis welcomes Chinese Minister of National Defense Gen. Wei Fenghe to the Pentagon

Defense counsel for the alleged 9/11 conspirators at Guantanamo Bay have raised serious concerns over Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's decision to revoke a previously agreed-upon plea deal. The move has sparked controversy and accusations of corruption within the military justice system.

The plea deal, which had been the result of over two years of negotiations, was abruptly revoked by Austin just days after it was announced. This decision has been met with backlash from various parties, including political figures and groups advocating for the death penalty for the 9/11 suspects.

Legal experts and defense teams have argued that Austin's revocation of the agreement may have violated military regulations, specifically the Manual for Military Commissions. The defense attorneys have pointed out that the accused had already begun fulfilling their end of the deal, which, according to the regulations, should prevent the convening authority from withdrawing the agreement.

Despite the defense's claims of illegality, a senior defense official has maintained that Austin acted lawfully in revoking the plea deal. The official also stated that Austin was surprised by the announcement of the agreement, despite the lengthy negotiations that had taken place.

In response to the criticism, Austin defended his decision, emphasizing the importance of ensuring justice for the victims of 9/11 and their families. However, the defense teams argue that revoking the deal may actually harm the families, as it disrupts the process of obtaining answers from the detainees as part of the agreement.

Legal experts have also cast doubt on the likelihood of the 9/11 cases proceeding to trial and sentencing, citing previous cases where evidence of torture and abuse led to plea agreements rather than trials. They question Austin's assertion that the cases will result in trials and potentially the death penalty.

The situation remains contentious, with ongoing litigation and differing perspectives on the legality and implications of Austin's decision to revoke the plea deal.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.