In a recent courtroom session, Terrence Bradley was set to appear via Zoom while the rest of the proceedings took place live. The focus of the discussion was on the attorney-client privilege and specifically Mr. Bradley's knowledge of the relationship between two individuals. The judge determined that this specific aspect needed further exploration and allowed the parties to delve into this topic.
During the session, there was a discussion about Mr. Wade potentially being recalled as a witness, but it was clarified that he had been released from the subpoena unless re-subpoenaed. Mr. Bradley was expected to be present in person, but his absence led to inquiries about his whereabouts.
As the questioning proceeded, there were objections raised regarding the relevance and foundation of certain lines of questioning. The focus was on establishing when Mr. Bradley first gained knowledge of the relationship in question. Despite attempts to narrow down the timeline, Mr. Bradley maintained that he did not have a specific date or event to attribute to his knowledge.
Further details emerged regarding a contract received by Mr. Bradley in January 2021, which was renewed in 2022. Questions arose about whether the romantic relationship had commenced by the time of the contract's issuance in January 2021.
The session highlighted the complexities of determining the timeline and sources of knowledge in legal proceedings, with objections raised and clarifications sought on various points of inquiry. The judge navigated through the objections to ensure a clear line of questioning and relevance in the courtroom discussion.
