Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Entertainment
Mark Fisher

Constant Companions review – Ayckbourn’s sex robots show our need for messy humanity

Our friends electric … Constant Companions.
Our friends electric … Leigh Symonds and Naomi Petersen in Constant Companions. Photograph: Tony Bartholomew

On one level, Alan Ayckbourn’s zesty new play is like a comic version of Humans, the Channel 4 drama series exploring the moral complications of keeping sentient machines in the house. There are robot-human love affairs and questions about robot rights. Ayckbourn even has a joke about an anti-android pressure group, one of the programme’s central strands.

Set “some time to come” – and then some decades after that – Constant Companions has fun imagining the hazards of malfunctioning sex robots, misbehaving eco-domestic auto-maids and human-like lovers who never grow old. All it takes is a tweak of an empathy algorithm and a soulless automaton becomes a sexually desirable catch – albeit one with an erratic sense of humour.

That is true for Lorraine (Alexandra Mathie), a high-flying lawyer who trades her selfish husband for JAN 60 (Richard Stacey), the office’s robot janitor, hilariously deadpan with his bird-like head movements and pre-programmed small talk.

It is equally true for Winston (Leigh Symonds), an engineer who is hoodwinked by ED (Naomi Petersen), an android who can dissemble and seduce, even if she can’t override the setting to curtsy every time she speaks the name of her owner, Mrs De Sousa (Tanya-Loretta Dee).

Hilariously deadpan … Constant Companions.
Hilariously deadpan … Richard Stacey and Georgia Burnell in Constant Companions. Photograph: Tony Bartholomew

As these parallel stories play out, we see Ayckbourn operating on a second level. Like all good science fiction, Constant Companions is less about the future than the present and, in his jokes about machine logic and human contrariness, and behind his speculation about a robot class outliving the species that created it, Ayckbourn asks his deepest questions about human companionship and sexual desire.

Like lonely bachelor Don (Andy Cryer), we might dream of a bed-mate so amply proportioned she can’t get out of the bathroom. Like Lorraine, we might long for a partner who acquiesces to every absurd argument we make. Like Winston, in a desperately tender performance by Symonds that is closest to the play’s emotional heart, we might imagine a robot who could reignite some long lost youthful romance.

In reality, what we need, whether we realise it or not, is messy humanity; not an idealised automaton but a complex mix of failure, vulnerability and contradiction. The machines might take over, Ayckbourn seems to say, but they will never replace the things that make us love and laugh.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.