Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Sport
Jonathan Wilson

Chelsea’s gamble on young guns looks like another shot in the dark by US owners

Enzo Fernández plays a pass on his Chelsea debut against Fulham after his £106.8m move from Benfica. How can this sort of outlay make a return for Clearlake’s investors?
Enzo Fernández plays a pass on his Chelsea debut against Fulham after his £106.8m transfer as his £33.5m teammate Benoît Badiashile watches on. How can this sort of outlay make a return for Clearlake’s investors? Photograph: Darren Walsh/Chelsea FC/Getty Images

Amortisation over a long-term deal. Heavily incentivised contracts. A couple of relatively quiet windows before Roman Abramovich was forced to sell the club. There’s been a lot written over the past few months about how Chelsea can afford a spree that will hit £620m when the Christopher Nkunku deal happens next June. But perhaps the bigger question is why? What on earth are they doing?

Structure the deals as cleverly as you like, that money still has to be paid at some point. Chelsea’s spending has been of the sort you would expect from a megalomaniac billionaire taking over a club, when the point is to have fun or make a splash, when long-term planning means less than “Get me Robinho, now!” In that regard, the careful squad-building of the Saudi Public Investment Fund at Newcastle has been a huge disappointment.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.