"Despite clear interests on almost all sides against a regional war [in the Middle East], all sides are acting in a manner that makes such a war increasingly likely," writes Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, in an October 15 article calling for the Biden administration to push for "de-escalation" between Israel and Hamas.
He says that although the Biden administration is "well aware" of "escalation risks" that might lead to a broader regional war, talk of de-escalation remains off-limits. The Huffington Post reports that it has obtained State Department memos instructing employees to avoid terms like "de-escalation/ceasefire," "end to violence/bloodshed," and "restoring calm" in press materials and statements.
But is de-escalation even feasible after Hamas slaughtered Israeli civilians and continues to hold close to 200 hostages? How should Israel respond to the worst terrorist attack in its history? What can U.S. policymakers do to make the prospect of a bigger war less likely?
Join Reason's Zach Weissmueller and Liz Wolfe for a live discussion of these questions and more with Trita Parsi this Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern on Reason's YouTube channel or Facebook page.
Sources referenced in this conversation:
"Biden refuses to talk 'ceasefire' even though it could prevent a regional war," by Trita Parsi
"Stunning State Department Memo Warns Diplomats: No Gaza 'De-Escalation' Talk," by
"Source: Iran warns Israel through UN against ground offensive in Gaza," by Barak Ravid
"Iran says 'preemptive action' by resistance front expected in coming hours," by Reuters
"Talks fail to let aid reach Gaza; Israel evacuates Lebanon border," by Nidal Al-Mughrabi, Dan Williams and Yusri Mohamed
"Biden is expected to request $100 billion for Israel, Ukraine and other crises," by Karoun Demirjian
The post Can America Help 'De-escalate' in the Middle East? appeared first on Reason.com.
