A former top government official has revealed Boris Johnson was briefed in person about allegations of wrongdoing by former deputy chief whip Chris Pincher.
The former permanent secretary at the Foreign Office Lord McDonald has said in a letter to the parliamentary standards commissioner that the Prime Minister was briefed "in person" about an investigation into the Tory MP's conduct as a foreign office minister.
In a letter to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Kathryn Stone Sir Simon McDonald suggested Downing Street lied.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson DID know of concerns about Chris Pincher before making him a whip
McDonald, who left the Foreign Office in 2020, spoke out after it was confirmed Pincher underwent a probe in 2019 over alleged "inappropriate" behaviour.
In his letter McDonald hit out at No10 over its claims about what the PM knew when he appointed Pincher as deputy chief whip in February this year.
On Friday, Downing Street said Johnson was not aware of any specific allegations.
Yesterday, No10 changed its position saying Boris Johnson did know about concerns around Pincher before giving him a job during his reshuffle.
The MP for Tamworth resigned his government role last week after it was alleged he drunkenly groped two men at a private members' club in London.
Simon McDonald's letter in full:
Dear Ms Stone,
The Rt Hon Christopher Pincher MP
Five days after Mr Pincher's resignation as deputy chief whip, there remains significant confusion surrounding complaints about his behaviour prior to the drunkenness he admits at the Carlton Club on 29 June.
Inaccurate claims by 10 Downing Street continue to be repeated in the media. On 3 July, the BBC website reported: "No official complaints against [Mr Pincher] were ever made."
This is not true. In the summer of 2019, shortly after he was appointed minister of state at the Foreign Office, a group of officials complained to me about Mr Pincher's behaviour.
I discussed the matter with the relevant official at the Cabinet Office. (In substance, the allegations were similar to those made about his behaviour at the Carlton Cub.) An investigation upheld the complaint; Mr Pincher apologised and promised not to repeat the inappropriate behaviour. There was no repetition at the FCO before he left seven months later.
The same BBC website report continued: "Downing Street has said Boris Johnson was not aware of any specific allegations when he appointed Mr Pincher deputy chief whip in February."
By 4 July, the BBC website reflected a change in No 10's line: "The prime minister's official spokesman said Mr Johnson knew of "allegations that were either resolved or did not progress to a formal complaint", adding that 'it was deemed not appropriate to stop an appointment simply because of unsubstantiated allegations'."
The original No 10 line is not true and the modification is still not accurate. Mr Johnson was briefed in person about the initiation and outcome of the investigation. There was a "formal complaint".
Allegations were "resolved" only in the sense that the investigation was completed; Mr Pincher was not exonerated. To characterise the allegations as "unsubstantiated" is therefore wrong.
I am aware that is unusual to write to you and simultaneously publicise the letter. I am conscious of the duty owed to the target of an investigation but I act out of of my duty towards the victims.
Mr Pincher deceived me and others in 2019. He cannot be allowed to use the confidentiality of the process three years ago to pursue his predatory behaviour in other contexts.
Yours sincerely,
Simon
To sign up to the Daily Record Politics newsletter, click here.
