US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has said the United States “was not aware of or involved in” the killing of Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh, which has escalated already heightened tensions across the Middle East.
In an interview with Channel News Asia on Wednesday, Blinken said he did not want to speculate as to what effect Haniyeh’s killing in the Iranian capital would have.
“This is something we were not aware of or involved in,” the top US diplomat said. “It’s very hard to speculate, and I’ve learned over many years never to speculate on the impact one event may have on something else. So I can’t tell you what this means.”
Haniyeh’s killing in the early hours of Wednesday in Tehran, where he was attending the swearing-in ceremony of Iran’s new President Masoud Pezeshkian, has been condemned by leaders across the region and raised concerns about further escalation.
Hamas, the Palestinian political faction that governs the Gaza Strip, has blamed Israel for the attack on its political leader, saying Haniyeh was killed in a “treacherous Zionist raid”.
Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, also promised “harsh punishment” for Israel in retaliation for the assassination, saying it is Tehran’s duty to avenge Haniyeh.
Reporting from the Lebanese capital Beirut on Wednesday, Al Jazeera’s Zeina Khodr said recent responses to Haniyeh’s killing suggest there could be a “coordinated response” from Iran and its regional allies.
“In Iran, they are hoisting the red flag – the flag of revenge. So there is a lot of anger,” she said.
Israel has yet to comment on the attack but had previously promised to kill Haniyeh and other Hamas leaders after the group’s October 7 attack on southern Israel, which killed 1,139 people and triggered the country’s war on Gaza.
Israel also carried out a bombing in Beirut just hours before Haniyeh was killed, saying it targeted Fuad Shukr, a commander of Lebanese group Hezbollah. At least three people, including two children, were killed and 74 others wounded.
Iran’s mission to the United Nations said in a letter to the Security Council that as Israel’s “strategic ally”, the US’s responsibility in the killing “cannot be overlooked”.
“This act could not have occurred without the authorization and intelligence support of the US,” it said. The Security Council will hold an emergency session later on Wednesday to discuss the situation in the region.
Ceasefire talks
Haniyeh, 62, had been involved in negotiations to try to secure a ceasefire in Gaza, where Israeli attacks have killed at least 39,445 Palestinians since early October.
The prime minister of Qatar, which has acted as a mediator in Gaza ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas, questioned the chances of the talks succeeding following the assassination.
“How can mediation succeed when one party assassinates the negotiator on the other side?” Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani posted on social media.
In Wednesday’s interview with Channel News Asia, the US’s Blinken said “the imperative of getting a ceasefire, the importance that that has for everyone, remains”.
“We will continue to labour that for as long as it takes to get there,” Blinken said.
“It’s vitally important to help end the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza. It’s vitally important in getting the hostages [held in Gaza] home, including a number of Americans. It’s vitally important to hopefully put things on a better path for more enduring peace, for more enduring security.”
The US government has been widely criticised for providing unwavering support to Israel, including military aid and equipment, during the Gaza war. Human rights advocates have urged US President Joe Biden’s administration to end weapons shipments to Israel as the conflict drags on.
With the future of truce negotiations between Hamas and Israel unclear, few breakthroughs were expected during Wednesday’s UN Security Council meeting, Al Jazeera’s Rosiland Jordan reported from Washington, DC.
No resolutions were set to be voted on, she explained, and the session – requested by Iran – was set to serve only as a forum to provide further clarity on a spiralling situation.
“Really, the Security Council’s role at this point is one of letting countries put their statements out for the entire world community to see,” Jordan said. “To vent, as it were, and to try to help build some impetus for countries to try to deal with each other, to try to help make deals that can actually be implemented.”
