President Biden is set to announce an executive action on the border that would suspend asylum requests between ports of entry once daily migrant encounters reach 2,500. This move has sparked debates on its effectiveness and underlying motives.
Former Border Patrol chief, Rodney Scott, criticized the proposed action, labeling it as political theater that won't address the root issues. Scott highlighted that the current influx of over a thousand illegal entries a day hampers border patrol's ability to proactively patrol, giving cartels control over border crossings.
Scott pointed out that the administration's plan to trigger the new authority at 2,500 encounters while capping it at 1,500 suggests a lack of real impact on curbing illegal immigration. He emphasized that the system lacks the capacity to detain and process individuals from diverse countries like Nepal, China, Pakistan, and India.
Moreover, Scott raised concerns about the administration's reliance on the CBP one app for processing asylum claims, questioning its efficacy in managing the overwhelming flow of migrants. He criticized the administration for dismantling programs like Remain in Mexico and asylum cooperative agreements, attributing them to the current border crisis.
Scott underscored the need for a comprehensive strategy to address the border situation effectively. He suggested reinstating programs like Remain in Mexico and enhancing vetting procedures against US databases to ensure national security.
The ongoing debate reflects the complexities of managing the border crisis and the challenges posed by the surge in illegal entries. As the administration grapples with balancing humanitarian concerns and border security, the effectiveness of proposed measures remains a subject of scrutiny.
