Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
National
Helen Pidd North of England editor

Benjamin Mendy rape case: not-guilty verdicts came down to question of consent

Benjamin Mendy arriving at Chester crown court  during his trial for rape, attempted rape and sexual assault.
Benjamin Mendy arriving at Chester crown court last November during his trial for rape, attempted rape and sexual assault. Photograph: Oli Scarff/AFP/Getty Images

In some ways, the trial of Benjamin Mendy was not complex. Even the prosecution barrister, Timothy Cray KC, said it was “the opposite of a whodunnit”. For all of the rape charges the Manchester City footballer faced, both sides agreed that sexual activity had taken place. The question was: did the women consent?

On charges relating to four of his accusers, the jury decided unanimously that he was not guilty of rape and sexual assault. They could not reach verdicts on two outstanding counts, of attempting to rape one woman and of raping another.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.