Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - AU
The Guardian - AU
National
Nino Bucci and Amy Remeikis (earlier)

Bill Shorten says robodebt royal commission set to start this year – as it happened

That's it for today, thanks for reading

Here are the main stories on Thursday, 28 July:

Enjoy the rest of your evening, we’ll see you back here tomorrow morning.

The shadow attorney general, Julian Leeser, has responded to the government’s decision to drop an appeal seeking to restore power to deport Aboriginal non-citizens.
Leeser said:

Attorney general Mark Dreyfus has withdrawn the federal government’s high court appeal in minister for immigration v Montgomery. Mr Dreyfus must explain to the Australian people why he felt the need to intervene when the case had been heard and the high court had reserved its judgement in Montgomery. Does he not trust the high court to interpret the constitution?

After his unprecedented intervention to discontinue the prosecution of Bernard Collaery who was charged with serious national security offences, Mr Dreyfus must explain why he is intervening in yet another case before the courts which could have helped to clarify the operation of Australia’s migration law. Mr Dreyfus has not even been attorney general for 100 days and yet he has interfered in two cases before the courts. How can the first law officer have so little faith in our justice system?

Julian Leeser
The shadow attorney general, Julian Leeser. Photograph: Sam Mooy/AAP

Updated

New infrastructure minister condemns Coalition running of Building Better Regions Fund

Further to the audit office’s blistering report on the Coalition’s handling of the Building Better Regions Fund, new infrastructure minister Catherine King has promised change in how Labor would manage such grants programs.

In a statement, King called the auditor general’s assessment “scathing”, adding:

It confirms what we already suspected: that the former government actively ignored grant guidelines and, in the process, dudded hard working regional Australians.

Over five rounds of the program, 65% of infrastructure grants went to projects that were not assessed as having the most merit. Former Coalition ministers made decisions on the basis of ‘choose-your-own-adventure’ criteria that weren’t fully explained to those applying for grants. They did not keep proper records of decisions.

King claimed the former government had made “decisions to ignore the merit list” of the infrastructure department, which gave major benefits to Nationals-held seats. She said:

Those seats got $104m more – 29% – than if the proper processes had been followed.

King said she was already working on a new strategic regional investment framework, promising decisions which are “evidence-based, coordinated, and transparent” and saying that the government would have “more to say on this in the months ahead”.

Catherine King
Infrastructure minister Catherine King. Photograph: Lukas Coch/AAP

Updated

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.