A Singapore court has sentenced an Australian man to five and a half years in prison for killing an elderly man and hurting his wife with a thrown wine bottle, in what the judge called an act of religious hostility towards Muslims.
Andrew Gosling was convicted of "causing death and grievous hurt by a rash act" for throwing a wine bottle at a group of people two storeys below him, striking a 73-year-old Singaporean man and killing him in 2019.
The bottle ricocheted and injured the shoulder of the man's wife.
"I agree with the prosecution that the present offence involves an element of demonstration of religious hostility towards Muslims," judge Victor Yeo said.
"Such offences could seriously undermine Singapore's racial and religious harmony and must not be tolerated and must be firmly dealt with."
Singapore is a multiracial country of 5.5 million people, of whom about 16 per cent are Muslim, with bigger Buddhist and Christian communities.
It has a predominantly ethnic Chinese population with sizeable Malay and Indian minorities, according to the 2020 census. The victims have been identified as ethnic Malay Muslims.
"It's fate," Manisah binte Sitri, the wife of the man Gosling killed, said after the sentencing. Her children added that only time would heal their emotional wounds.
The court had been told that Gosling admitted during the investigation he was "angry and upset" over Islamic militant attacks in Bali and Melbourne in which many Australians had died, and wanted to "startle" the group after identifying them as Muslims.
Prosecutors said Gosling, who was 49 years old at the time of the crime, ran away shouting "crude, religiously charged vulgarities" about Muslims.
His actions had the "wider impact of causing unease in Singapore, especially amongst the broader Muslim population" and demonstrated religious hostility, the prosecution said.
Gosling had been in Singapore seeking work at the time.
Through most of Friday's hearing, Gosling, who had pleaded guilty, stared straight ahead but turned around briefly to look at his parents, who were present in court.
The maximum penalty for the first charge against Gosling — causing death by a rash act — is five years imprisonment, a fine, or both, while the maximum penalty for the second charge — causing grievous hurt by rash act — is a jail term of up to four years, a fine, or both.
Gosling was given four years' imprisonment under the first charge, and 18 months for the second charge.
The judge said he accepted the mitigating factors such as Gosling being "genuinely remorseful" for his actions after turning himself in to the authorities, his guilty plea and his voluntary compensation payment to the victims' family.
Gosling's lawyers had said alcohol might have impaired his judgement, citing a psychiatric report, and argued his act was unlikely to have been religiously motivated. They added he intended to appeal against the sentence.
Gosling's mother Pamela told reporters outside the court that her son was not the sort of person to be hostile towards Muslims.
"He's our son and he is a gentle person and … he would never ever have thought those things and done those things," she said.
"It was something genuinely wrong for him to do that.
"He has friends who are all different races, all different nationalities, all different religions.
"He is not like that. He would have been very upset, as we all were in Australia, with those bombings and everything else and we had them in Melbourne."
The prison sentence will commence retroactively from August 2019, when Gosling was taken into custody.
ABC/wires
