Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - AU
The Guardian - AU
National
Jordyn Beazley and Amy Remeikis (earlier)

Coalition senators split in voting on Ralph Babet motion on abortion – as it happened

Simon Birmingham in the Senate chamber last Thursday
Simon Birmingham in the Senate chamber last Thursday. The Coalition senator opposed a motion regarding abortion moved by UAP senator Ralph Babet. Photograph: Mike Bowers/The Guardian

What we learned: Tuesday 20 August

This is where we’ll wrap up the blog for today – but first, a quick recap:

Updated

Coalition senator says Parliament ‘is not our playground’ and ‘the things we do here matter’ amid divisive abortion motion

Maria Kovacic, a Liberal senator, told the Senate when it was considering a motion regarding abortion proposed by the UAP’s Ralph Babet:

What is critically important in relation to this issue, and any other issues for that matter, that this chamber addresses is that we keep in mind the language that we use, the accuracy of the information that we share and the transparency for the reasons that we share them.

This is not our playground. The things that we do here matter.

There are also questions as to the accuracy of the information contained in this motion. This is a matter of great sensitivity. There is no question about that. The motion as set out is very black and white. The matters for which it deals with are not.

Kovacic told the Senate that the constitution was clear that abortion was a matter for the states, not for the federal parliament:

More broadly, the complexity of issues that arise from the contents of this motion are challenging for most people, but particularly for women, and they are deeply personal. They are not decisions that are made either lightly or flippantly, and should not be open to judgment by others. In many cases, these decisions are informed on the basis of medical necessity, and we should think very, very carefully as to the appropriateness of elected representatives making healthcare decisions for Australian women.

The Greens senator Larissa Waters told the Senate:

I am appalled that once again, we’re here debating women’s choices over their own bodies, choices that are no one else’s to weigh in on. Senator Babet’s claims are incorrect. Late-term abortions resulting in a live foetus are extremely rare, and they only occur in situations of lethal foetal abnormalities or serious risks to the pregnant person.

Medical practitioners are already subject to ethical responsibilities that manage those complex situations, and moreover, the vast majority of terminations in Australia occur prior to 16 weeks, at which time a foetus would not survive outside the womb.

If you want to prevent unwanted pregnancies, then support the calls by the Greens to make contraception free, but you just want to control women’s bodies.

Updated

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.