At Republic, we campaign for real reform, not an elected monarch in all but name

‘The role of head of state is, in part, to hold reserve powers so that, in times of crisis or political paralysis, an independent figure can step in.’ Photograph: Geoffrey Swaine/REX/Shutterstock

Duncan Wilson (Letters, 8 June 8) appears to have missed the significant differences between a parliamentary republic and a monarchy. Republic doesn’t, as he suggests, advocate for an elected monarch in all but name.

Aside from other major reforms, such as a fully elected parliament and a codified constitution, a republic gives us a genuinely non-partisan head of state who is also independent of government. The experience of other parliamentary republics, such as Ireland, Iceland, Finland and Germany, shows that this is a successful model compared with the British constitution.