In a recent development, it has been revealed that American Media Inc. (AMI) had made a strategic decision to run negative stories about Bill and Hillary Clinton before the August 2015 Trump Tower meeting. This information came to light during a conversation between two individuals, where Bove inquired about AMI's stance on publishing articles about the Clintons.
During the exchange, Bove sought confirmation from Pecker, a key figure at AMI, regarding the decision to feature stories about the Clintons in the National Enquirer. Pecker acknowledged that AMI had indeed chosen to run negative articles about the Clintons, indicating that it was in the best interest of the company.
The focus of the discussion revolved around the perceived benefits of running such stories for AMI. Bove probed further, questioning Pecker about the nature of the articles, to which Pecker confirmed that they were indeed negative in tone.
Pecker emphasized that the decision to publish these stories was a strategic one, aimed at advancing the business objectives of AMI. The revelation sheds light on the behind-the-scenes machinations within the media industry and raises questions about the motivations behind certain editorial decisions.
As the details of this conversation come to the fore, it underscores the complex interplay between media organizations, political figures, and business interests. The disclosure of AMI's deliberate choice to feature negative stories about prominent political figures adds another layer to the ongoing discourse surrounding media ethics and journalistic integrity.
