Anthony Albanese has called for a debate on the blocking of misogynistic content online before a snap national cabinet meeting focused on women’s safety.
In addition to information sharing on high-risk perpetrators and serial offenders, the federal government has signalled that strengthening violence prevention through a focus on online harms will be a priority at Wednesday’s meeting, the first national cabinet of 2024.
But Albanese will also face a push from the Northern Territory for needs-based domestic and family violence funding, adding to calls from the Greens for more money for the 10-year national plan to reduce violence against women and their children.
A spokesperson said commonwealth efforts on online harms, to be discussed at the meeting, include “countering violent and misogynistic content and access to age-inappropriate material on social media”.
On Tuesday the communications minister, Michelle Rowland, said Australians were “very frustrated” about social media algorithms serving up misogynist content to young people.
She conceded that the algorithms deciding what content was shown to users were “opaque”, and regulation had proved a challenge for governments worldwide, but said the government was “determined to make positive changes in this area”.
Guardian Australia understands the government is considering whether reforms to the Online Safety Act and the eSafety commissioner’s powers could compel social media platforms to block young people from seeing such content.
The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said cracking down on misogynist content online was “a debate we have to have” as influencers including Andrew Tate were “symptomatic of a problem that is a global problem that we’re dealing with”.
“We need to be very conscious about what is online and about the impact that it is having,” Albanese told reporters in Brisbane. “Now that is something that is a role for government, but it’s also a role for public discourse.
“The use of algorithms that can push that sort of material towards people as well, is of great concern. It’s something I know that Michelle [Rowland] is concerned about … certainly it’s the debate that we have to have.”
Albanese said he wouldn’t “pre-empt the discussion” at national cabinet on wider domestic violence issues but said any reforms would also require “attitudinal change” as well as “practical immediate measures and responses”.
State and territory leaders, through the Council for the Australian Federation chaired by South Australia’s Peter Malinauskas, will present a paper on their efforts to combat gendered violence.
Albanese said the meeting would consider “ways in which best practice can be replicated”, including the lessons from Victoria’s royal commission into domestic violence.
Malinauskas has said he discussed “sharing of intelligence about perpetrators across jurisdiction” with the prime minister as a potential outcome of Wednesday’s meeting.
A group of 11 crossbench MPs have written to the government asking for consideration of “immediate measures … within the justice system where bail laws and intervention orders are failing women”, including a national domestic violence register.
On Tuesday Albanese dead-batted a question about creation of such a register, noting that states and territories have “primary responsibility” for the justice system.
He noted that “on average one woman loses their life every four days” and Indigenous women are 7.6 times more likely to lose their life at the hand of a partner or former partner than a non-Indigenous women.
Earlier Albanese rebuffed a push from the NT government for needs-based family and domestic violence funding.
He told ABC Alice Springs the federal government had already provided $40m of additional funding, and noted that “some of the GST money” given by the federal “isn’t tied to anything”, meaning it could be spent by the NT government for that purpose.
Despite the crossbench push for bail reform, it is considered an unlikely outcome of the meeting, given the experience in Victoria and warnings from experts that tougher rules had unintended consequences for women, children and Aboriginal people.
Emma Buxton-Namisnyk, a University of New South Wales criminologist focusing on domestic violence, supported NSW’s plan to review whether bail decisions on domestic violence cases should be decided by a registrar, but said bail reform could cause unintended consequences and should be undertaken cautiously.
“We should be really wary of punitive responses that are announced in haste because they typically disproportionately impact First Nations people and have unintended effects that aren’t foreseen,” she said.
Emma Russell, a La Trobe University expert in crime and justice, advised against any bail law reforms that would have a “net-wide effect”, pointing to the Victorian government passing bail law reforms in 2018 that were boasted to be as the toughest in the country in the wake of the Bourke Street massacre in 2017.
Russell said rather than improving community protection, the move in Victoria trapped some of the most disadvantaged people in a cycle of incarceration, including victim-survivors of domestic and family violence – some of whom were misidentified as primary aggressors in domestic and family violence situations.
The laws were amended after Veronica Nelson died while on remand in 2020 after she was refused bail for a shoplifting offence.
Additional reporting by Eden Gillespie and Benita Kolovos
