Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Foreign Policy
Foreign Policy
Comment
Michael F. Harsch, Taylor Whitsell, Stefanie Glinski

Afghans Don't Need U.S. Troops. They Need Islands of Stability.

An Afghan man belonging to the Uzbek ethnic group feeds pigeons in Mazar-i-Sharif, the capital of the northern Afghan Balkh province, on June 2, 2007. SHAH MARAI/AFP via Getty Images

Last week, U.S. President Joe Biden announced the remaining 3,500 U.S. forces in Afghanistan will be withdrawn by Sept. 11—a decision that sets a clear date for the United States’ military exit. What remains unclear is the administration’s plan for ensuring sufficient stability in Afghanistan without a U.S. troop presence. As September approaches, Biden may face new questions about how the last U.S. forces can leave Afghanistan without leaving chaos behind. Fortunately, there are new answers he can offer.

The U.S. policy in fragile, conflict-affected states is often perceived as a binary choice between either total retrenchment or the largely discredited top-down state-building of recent decades. A multiyear research project on islands of stability suggests a middle ground: a region-driven approach to stabilizing fragile states that could allow the United States to help expand local peace and prosperity in Afghanistan, even amid ongoing conflict, without requiring it to have boots on the ground.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.