Washington (AFP) - US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, author of the court's ruling to overturn abortion rights, said Friday that he and other conservative justices were "targets of assassination" after the decision was leaked last year.
Alito told the Wall Street Journal in a rare interview that he believes he knows who leaked the draft of his decision nearly two months before it was finalized, but he doesn't have proof.
The unprecedented leak of the so-called Dobbs case on May 2, 2022 rocked the country, both over what it meant for abortion rights and the implication that politics had permeated the court, which sees itself above the partisan fray.
"I personally have a pretty good idea who is responsible, but that's different from the level of proof that is needed to name somebody," Alito told the Journal.
"It was a part of an effort to prevent the Dobbs draft...from becoming the decision of the court," he said.
After a sweeping investigation, in January the court said it could not pinpoint the source of the leak.
Alito said it led to the near-attack on Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who was viewed by some as a possible swing voter on the abortion rights issue.
An armed man was arrested outside Kavanaugh's suburban Washington home in the early morning hours of June 8.
The man told police he had travelled from California to Washington to kill a high court justice, saying he was upset about the leaked draft and school shootings.
"Those of us who were thought to be in the majority, thought to have approved my draft opinion, were really targets of assassination," Alito said.
"It was rational for people to believe that they might be able to stop the decision in Dobbs by killing one of us."
Alito said the threat level rose after the leak to the point that he was blocked by security from speaking in person at a local university last May.
He says that even he now must travel in what he labelled "a tank" surrounded by security.
The leak not only sparked security issues.It also added rancor to relations between the nine justices, said Alito.
The leak "created an atmosphere of suspicion and distrust.We worked through it...But it was damaging," he said.
'Hammered daily'
The court published its 6-3 decision to overturn the landmark 1972 Roe v. Wade decision guaranteeing abortion rights on June 24.
It drew strong cheers from anti-abortion activists who were energized to carry their fight into the states.
But it left Americans in favor of abortion rights, which polls show are a solid majority, angered and dismayed.
Alito said the whole episode raised the intensity of criticism of the court, which he called "new during my lifetime."
"We are being hammered daily, and I think quite unfairly in a lot of instances.And nobody, practically nobody, is defending us," he said.
He faulted the legal community specifically for not defending the high court.
"If anything, they've participated to some degree in these attacks."
But he said nothing about calls for greater scrutiny over the nine justices, their political leanings and their finances.
On Tuesday the court's Chief Justice John Roberts refused to testify in Congress about business dealings by two conservative justices and lavish gifts one received that have raised ethics issues.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is seeking information on recent reports that the court's longest-serving justice, Clarence Thomas, and his wife received lavish gifts and took vacations worth millions of dollars with property billionaire and Republican donor Harlan Crow.
Roberts cited "separation of powers concerns and the importance of preserving judicial independence" in declining the committee's invitation.
Asked about the allegations against Thomas, a fellow conservative, Alito told the Journal: "I'll stay away from that."
After being confirmed for life terms by the US Senate, Supreme Court justices are not required to answer questions from the public.
The last time a justice answered questions in Congress was 2011, and it was over the same issue.
The committee nevertheless plans a hearing on Tuesday on ethics reform for the high court.
