Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Sport
Exclusive by Matt Hughes

‘A hell of a debate’: row looms over Champions League elite’s share of EFL deal payments

Manchester City celebrate winning the Champions League at the presentation ceremony in Istanbul
The six English teams in the Champions League – including Manchester City, the 2023 winners – will share more than £600m. Photograph: Tom Jenkins/The Guardian

A number of mid-ranking Premier League clubs are lobbying for a percentage of the biggest teams’ Uefa revenue to be used to help fund a new financial settlement with the English Football League.

Talks over the so-called New Deal for Football have been in stasis since midway through the 2023-24 season, when the Premier League put negotiations on hold after failing to get the support of clubs for a funding deal for the lower divisions that would have been worth £880m over six years. The newly created Independent Football Regulator has been charged by the government with reviving the discussions and has been given backstop powers to impose a settlement if the parties are unable to agree. Divisions within the Premier League over how to pay for it remain.

A senior source at one established top-flight club told the Guardian that “a hell of a debate” is looming over funding the deal, and that there are plans to petition the IFR and Premier League to introduce a levy on Uefa income, which is in place in some European countries.

The Premier League’s six clubs in the Champions League this season are poised to receive a combined total of more than £600m in broadcast income and prize money, with Manchester City, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea and Tottenham having each banked more than £80m for reaching the last 16.

Newcastle’s share to date is smaller at about £50m, because they score significantly lower on Uefa’s value pillar assessment, which is partly based on historical performances.

“We all want to do a deal with the EFL, but why should it be solely funded by the Premier League’s TV money?” the source said. “If that’s the case then a disproportionate burden will fall on the smaller clubs, who in effect will be funding their direct rivals in the EFL.

“There’s going to be a hell of a debate about how this is funded. Other European leagues have a levy on Uefa income as part of their redistribution mechanism, and we should do the same.”

The Eredivisie in the Netherlands is one league with such a system. Dutch clubs in Uefa competitions must pay 5% of their group-stage prize money to teams in the league that did not qualify for Europe, a figure which drops to 3.75% of revenue in the knockout stages. In addition, 15% of the clubs’ Uefa revenue is distributed to teams in the second tier.

The plans to call for a similar levy in the Premier League are at an early stage, partly because the IFR’s role in the New Deal negotiations is in its infancy.

The IFR’s first task is to complete its State of the Game review, which is due to be published at the start of next year. The IFR chair, David Kogan, has met the Premier League and EFL and urged them to reach an agreement but cannot impose one until the review has concluded.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.