A newly proposed Trump administration rule could strip up to $331 a month from hundreds of thousands of low-income Americans, reversing a Biden-era policy intended to protect disabled and low-income individuals from steep financial penalties.
The proposal, which the Social Security Administration submitted last July, targets the Supplemental Security Income program. If implemented, the policy change would reduce monthly payments for roughly 275,000 beneficiaries and completely eliminate eligibility for more than 100,000 others across the country.
The policy hinges on how the federal government defines a “public assistance household.”
In 2024, the Biden administration expanded this definition to automatically include households receiving SNAP benefits. Under that rule, an entire household qualified if just one member received a qualifying public benefit.
The new proposal from the Trump administration seeks to remove SNAP from that list and return to a stricter standard where every single member of a household must receive public assistance to qualify.
For SSI beneficiaries living with family, this change carries heavy financial consequences. Under the revised rule, any assistance a beneficiary receives from family members, such as a place to live or shared food, would be counted as unearned income.
Under the proposal, the SSA would deduct the estimated value of that housing from the beneficiary’s monthly government check, even if the family’s income is low enough to qualify for nutritional assistance.
Advocacy organizations and state officials have strongly criticized the plan.
Opponents caution that the rollback would disproportionately harm vulnerable individuals who depend on both SSI and SNAP to get by, with the harshest impacts falling on indigent seniors and adults with disabilities who live with family after turning 18 without paying full rent.
The maximum monthly federal SSI benefit is currently $994, an amount that sits at roughly three-quarters of the federal poverty guidelines for a single person. If the administration pushes the rule through, affected recipients would see their monthly checks cut by about 33 percent, leaving them with $663 each month to cover all living expenses.
Federal officials have defended the adjustment. The SSA framed the proposal as a necessary measure to protect and maintain the long-term integrity of the benefits program.
The policy is not yet in effect. It must still pass through a lengthy regulatory process, including a mandatory period for public comment and administrative review.
The Independent has contacted the Social Security Administration for comment.
