
The House Oversight Committee has officially launched an investigation into how a private meeting may have led President Donald Trump to suddenly block the opening of the Gordie Howe International Bridge, a multi-billion dollar project connecting Michigan and Ontario.
Trump had previously approved the project during his first term without much further comment. That changed last week when he announced his intention to halt its opening. “I will not allow this bridge to open until the United States is fully compensated for everything we have given them, and also, importantly, Canada treats the United States with the Fairness and Respect that we deserve,” he posted on his social media platform.
What makes the timing notable is that just hours before Trump’s announcement, billionaire trucking magnate Matthew Moroun met with U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick in Washington. According to MS Now, Moroun owns the Ambassador Bridge, a competing crossing between Detroit and Windsor, Ontario. After that meeting, Lutnick spoke with Trump by phone, and shortly after, Trump issued his unexpected threat against the bridge.
The Moroun family stands to benefit from blocking a bridge that Canada fully paid for
The economic stakes are significant. Former Democratic Senator Debbie Stabenow of Michigan noted that the Detroit-Windsor crossing is the busiest northern border crossing in the United States, with billions of dollars in manufacturing and agricultural goods, along with essential workers, crossing daily.
Currently, the Ambassador Bridge, owned by the Moroun family, is the only bridge serving this critical trade corridor, giving them a near-monopoly. Trump’s sudden opposition appears to benefit the Morouns by keeping a competitor from opening. This is not the only instance where a Trump-appointed judge has made a surprising ruling that has raised eyebrows across the political spectrum.
An alleged meeting between Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and the billionaire owners of Detroit’s Ambassador Bridge isn’t sitting right with @RepRobertGarcia (D-CA), the top Democrat on the House oversight committee.
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) February 15, 2026
STORY: https://t.co/mM6VRhClQn pic.twitter.com/sabnlDD1Yc
There is no clear reason for U.S. officials to oppose the project. Canada paid the entire construction bill and will collect toll revenue only until costs are recovered, after which the bridge will be jointly owned by both countries. The U.S. bears none of the initial investment. While Trump and his team have raised new objections to a project they once supported, many observers have described these demands as “a mixture of fantasy and contrived grievance.”
Some have begun calling the situation “Bridgegate,” drawing comparisons to a past scandal that severely damaged a former New Jersey governor’s career. Meanwhile, lawmakers from both parties working to limit Trump’s powers have been pushing back against what they see as an increasingly unchecked executive branch. The investigation is ongoing, and the full details of what was discussed in the private meeting between Moroun and Lutnick have not yet been made public.